How to Secure Your Production Cluster Against Default Helm Settings

Introduction

Helm charts made Kubernetes adoption easier — and at the same time, they introduced one of the most dangerous habits in modern DevOps: “install & forget.

A chart installs successfully. Pods are running. Dashboards look green.
So teams move on.

Weeks or months later, problems start appearing:

  • Unexpected restarts
  • Performance degradation
  • Security findings
  • Exploding cloud bills
  • Painful upgrades

The root cause is rarely Kubernetes itself.
It’s almost always default Helm values shipped for demos — not production.

This article explains why “install & forget” Helm charts silently hurt production systems, what usually goes wrong, and how to approach Helm responsibly.


Why Helm Defaults Are Not Production Defaults

Helm charts are designed to:

  • Be generic
  • Work across environments
  • Install successfully with minimal configuration

They are not designed to reflect your production reality.

Most charts assume:

  • Small scale
  • Single tenant
  • Minimal security constraints
  • No strict cost controls
  • Short-lived or test workloads

Using defaults in production is equivalent to running a database with:

  • No resource limits
  • No backups
  • No authentication hardening
  • No lifecycle planning

It “works” — until it doesn’t.


Common Problems Caused by Default Helm Values

1. Resource Requests and Limits Are Missing or Unsafe

Many charts either:

  • Don’t define requests/limits at all, or
  • Define extremely low defaults

This leads to:

  • Pod eviction under pressure
  • CPU throttling
  • Noisy neighbor issues
  • Unpredictable autoscaling behavior

Production impact:
Applications become unstable during load spikes — exactly when you need them most.


2. Security Is an Afterthought

Default Helm values often:

  • Run containers as root
  • Skip PodSecurityContext hardening
  • Disable network policies
  • Expose services unnecessarily

Why?
Because secure defaults break installs in some environments — so charts stay permissive.

Production impact:
Security teams find issues after deployment, and fixes become disruptive.


3. Persistence and Storage Are Poorly Planned

Many charts:

  • Use default storage classes
  • Don’t tune volume sizes
  • Ignore backup and restore strategies

This is common with:

  • Databases
  • Message queues
  • Stateful services

Production impact:
Storage costs grow silently, backups are missing, and recovery becomes manual and risky.


4. Logging and Metrics Are Over-Enabled

Charts frequently enable:

  • Verbose logs
  • Multiple metrics exporters
  • Debug endpoints

This feels harmless — until you see the bill.

Production impact:
Cloud logging and monitoring costs increase month over month with no clear visibility.


5. Upgrades Become Nightmares

When you don’t fully understand or customize a chart:

  • Version upgrades introduce breaking changes
  • Deprecated values go unnoticed
  • Stateful upgrades fail mid-way

Production impact:
Teams delay upgrades, increasing security and stability risks.


Why “It’s Working Fine” Is a Dangerous Signal

One of the biggest mistakes teams make is assuming:

“It’s running fine, so defaults must be okay.”

Most Helm-related problems:

  • Appear under load
  • Surface during incidents
  • Explode during upgrades
  • Show up in cloud bills, not dashboards

By the time you notice, fixing defaults becomes a migration project.


A Better Way to Use Helm in Production

Helm itself is not the problem.
Unexamined defaults are.

Here’s a safer approach:

1. Treat values.yaml as Production Code

  • Review every section
  • Delete unused features
  • Explicitly set critical values
  • Version control environment-specific overrides

If you haven’t read the full values.yaml, you’re not done.


2. Define Non-Negotiables

Every production Helm deployment should explicitly define:

  • Resource requests and limits
  • Security context
  • Persistence settings
  • Upgrade strategy
  • Logging and metrics scope

If a chart doesn’t support these cleanly, that’s a red flag.


3. Test Failure Scenarios Early

Don’t just test:

helm install

Also test:

  • Pod restarts
  • Node pressure
  • Rolling upgrades
  • Rollbacks

Production failures rarely come from happy paths.


4. Minimize, Don’t Maximize

Avoid enabling:

  • Every exporter
  • Every sidecar
  • Every optional feature

Production systems benefit more from clarity than capability.


When Defaults Might Be Acceptable

Defaults are fine when:

  • You’re testing locally
  • You’re running short-lived demos
  • You’re evaluating a tool

They are not fine when:

  • Data matters
  • Costs matter
  • Security matters
  • Uptime matters

Which is… most production systems.


Final Thoughts

Helm charts didn’t make Kubernetes chaotic.
Uncritical adoption did.

“Install & forget” feels fast — but it creates slow, expensive problems later.

If you’re running Helm charts in production:

  • Read the values file
  • Customize intentionally
  • Remove what you don’t need
  • Own the configuration

Defaults are someone else’s assumptions.
Production is your responsibility.


Want More Like This?

Rebash focuses on real-world DevOps and Cloud lessons — without hype or overengineering.

👉 Explore more articles on Rebash
👉 Follow along for production-focused insights

🤞 Don’t miss the posts!

We don’t spam! Read more in our privacy policy

🤞 Don’t miss the posts!

We don’t spam! Read more in our privacy policy

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top